Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed

Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026

TL;DR

Sourcegraph CodyZed
Typeextensionide-native
VendorSourcegraphZed Industries
PricingFree tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/userFree tier · Pro $20/month (editor free, AI subscription optional)
AutocompleteYesYes
Agent modeYesYes
MCP supportNoYes
Local modelsYesYes
Self-hostedYesNo
Codebase indexingYesYes
Team featuresYesYes

Where Sourcegraph Cody wins

Where Zed wins

Weaknesses

Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor

Zed: smaller extension ecosystem than VS Code; AI features newer than Cursor's

Best for

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.

Pick Zed if you are macOS speed enthusiasts, or collaborative pair programming, or devs who find VS Code bloated.

Try Sourcegraph Cody Try Zed

FAQ

Is Sourcegraph Cody more expensive than Zed?

Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user vs Free tier · Pro $20/month (editor free, AI subscription optional). Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.

Do Sourcegraph Cody and Zed use the same AI models?

Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Zed supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, local-via-ollama. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.

Can I use both?

Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.

Related comparisons

Best Sourcegraph Cody and Zed pairings by language