Claude Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Claude Code | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | cli | extension |
| Vendor | Anthropic | Sourcegraph |
| Pricing | Pro $20/month · Team $30/user (included with Claude Pro/Team) | Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user |
| Autocomplete | No | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted | No | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | No | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Claude Code wins
- terminal-native
- sub-agents for parallelism
- hooks for automation
- plan mode
Where Sourcegraph Cody wins
- best-in-class codebase context via Sourcegraph search
- bring your own key
- self-hosted
Weaknesses
Claude Code: no autocomplete; no GUI
Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor
Best for
Pick Claude Code if you are terminal-first devs, or automation-heavy workflows, or big refactors with plan mode.
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.
Try Claude Code Try Sourcegraph Cody
FAQ
Is Claude Code more expensive than Sourcegraph Cody?
Pro $20/month · Team $30/user (included with Claude Pro/Team) vs Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Claude Code and Sourcegraph Cody use the same AI models?
Claude Code supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, claude-haiku-4-5. Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- Claude Code vs Cursor
- Claude Code vs Windsurf
- Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot
- Claude Code vs Aider
- Claude Code vs Cline