Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | ide-fork |
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Codeium |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user | Free tier · Pro $15/month · Business $30/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | No | Yes |
| Local models | Yes | No |
| Self-hosted | Yes | No |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Sourcegraph Cody wins
- best-in-class codebase context via Sourcegraph search
- bring your own key
- self-hosted
Where Windsurf wins
- Cascade autonomous mode
- flow credits stretch further
- explains plans before acting
Weaknesses
Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor
Windsurf: occasional Cascade hangs; slightly slower autocomplete
Best for
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.
Pick Windsurf if you are multi-file refactors, or budget-conscious devs, or less experienced users.
Try Sourcegraph Cody Try Windsurf
FAQ
Is Sourcegraph Cody more expensive than Windsurf?
Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user vs Free tier · Pro $15/month · Business $30/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Sourcegraph Cody and Windsurf use the same AI models?
Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Windsurf supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1, gemini-2.5-pro. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Claude Code
- Sourcegraph Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Aider
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cline