Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | extension |
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Tabnine |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user | Free tier · Pro $12/month · Enterprise $39/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | No | No |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Sourcegraph Cody wins
- best-in-class codebase context via Sourcegraph search
- bring your own key
- self-hosted
Where Tabnine wins
- SOC 2 + air-gapped deployment
- training-data guarantees
- enterprise trust
Weaknesses
Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor
Tabnine: consumer-facing UX trails Cursor/Windsurf; smaller community
Best for
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.
Pick Tabnine if you are regulated industries, or enterprises with strict data policies, or air-gapped environments.
Try Sourcegraph Cody Try Tabnine
FAQ
Is Sourcegraph Cody more expensive than Tabnine?
Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user vs Free tier · Pro $12/month · Enterprise $39/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine use the same AI models?
Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Tabnine supports: proprietary, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Claude Code
- Sourcegraph Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Aider