JetBrains AI vs Sourcegraph Cody
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| JetBrains AI | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ide-native | extension |
| Vendor | JetBrains | Sourcegraph |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $10/mo (AI Pro on top of IDE license) | Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | No | No |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | No | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where JetBrains AI wins
- deep IDE integration
- excellent for JVM langs and Kotlin
Where Sourcegraph Cody wins
- best-in-class codebase context via Sourcegraph search
- bring your own key
- self-hosted
Weaknesses
JetBrains AI: requires JetBrains subscription; less flexible than Cursor
Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor
Best for
Pick JetBrains AI if you are JVM/Kotlin/Swift devs already on JetBrains.
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.
Try JetBrains AI Try Sourcegraph Cody
FAQ
Is JetBrains AI more expensive than Sourcegraph Cody?
Free tier · Pro $10/mo (AI Pro on top of IDE license) vs Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do JetBrains AI and Sourcegraph Cody use the same AI models?
JetBrains AI supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1, gemini-2.5-pro. Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- JetBrains AI vs Cursor
- JetBrains AI vs Windsurf
- JetBrains AI vs Claude Code
- JetBrains AI vs GitHub Copilot
- JetBrains AI vs Aider