Cursor vs JetBrains AI
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Cursor | JetBrains AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ide-fork | ide-native |
| Vendor | Anysphere | JetBrains |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user | Free tier · Pro $10/mo (AI Pro on top of IDE license) |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | No | No |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Cursor wins
- autocomplete speed
- MCP support
- composer for multi-file
Where JetBrains AI wins
- deep IDE integration
- excellent for JVM langs and Kotlin
Weaknesses
Cursor: can lose context on branch switch; fast-request quota depletes quickly
JetBrains AI: requires JetBrains subscription; less flexible than Cursor
Best for
Pick Cursor if you are experienced devs, or macOS users, or MCP-heavy workflows.
Pick JetBrains AI if you are JVM/Kotlin/Swift devs already on JetBrains.
FAQ
Is Cursor more expensive than JetBrains AI?
Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user vs Free tier · Pro $10/mo (AI Pro on top of IDE license). Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Cursor and JetBrains AI use the same AI models?
Cursor supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-4.1, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro. JetBrains AI supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1, gemini-2.5-pro. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
Best Cursor and JetBrains AI pairings by language
- Python: Cursor for Python · JetBrains AI for Python
- TypeScript: Cursor for TypeScript · JetBrains AI for TypeScript
- Rust: Cursor for Rust · JetBrains AI for Rust
- Go: Cursor for Go · JetBrains AI for Go