Codeium vs Sourcegraph Cody
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Codeium | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | extension |
| Vendor | Codeium (same as Windsurf) | Sourcegraph |
| Pricing | Free tier · Enterprise $35/user | Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | No | Yes |
| MCP support | No | No |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Codeium wins
- generous free tier
- wide IDE support (40+)
- self-hosted option for enterprises
Where Sourcegraph Cody wins
- best-in-class codebase context via Sourcegraph search
- bring your own key
- self-hosted
Weaknesses
Codeium: Codeium/Windsurf overlap is confusing; chat less polished than Cursor
Sourcegraph Cody: most value if you already use Sourcegraph search; onboarding is longer than Cursor
Best for
Pick Codeium if you are cost-conscious teams, or polyglot IDE users, or enterprises wanting self-host.
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you are large monorepos, or enterprises already on Sourcegraph, or BYOK power users.
Try Codeium Try Sourcegraph Cody
FAQ
Is Codeium more expensive than Sourcegraph Cody?
Free tier · Enterprise $35/user vs Free tier · Pro $9/month · Enterprise $19/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Codeium and Sourcegraph Cody use the same AI models?
Codeium supports: proprietary, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1. Sourcegraph Cody supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, custom-via-byok. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.