Codeium vs Cursor
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Codeium | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | ide-fork |
| Vendor | Codeium (same as Windsurf) | Anysphere |
| Pricing | Free tier · Enterprise $35/user | Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | No | Yes |
| MCP support | No | Yes |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | No |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Codeium wins
- generous free tier
- wide IDE support (40+)
- self-hosted option for enterprises
Where Cursor wins
- autocomplete speed
- MCP support
- composer for multi-file
Weaknesses
Codeium: Codeium/Windsurf overlap is confusing; chat less polished than Cursor
Cursor: can lose context on branch switch; fast-request quota depletes quickly
Best for
Pick Codeium if you are cost-conscious teams, or polyglot IDE users, or enterprises wanting self-host.
Pick Cursor if you are experienced devs, or macOS users, or MCP-heavy workflows.
FAQ
Is Codeium more expensive than Cursor?
Free tier · Enterprise $35/user vs Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Codeium and Cursor use the same AI models?
Codeium supports: proprietary, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1. Cursor supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-4.1, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
Best Codeium and Cursor pairings by language
- Python: Codeium for Python · Cursor for Python
- TypeScript: Codeium for TypeScript · Cursor for TypeScript
- Rust: Codeium for Rust · Cursor for Rust
- Go: Codeium for Go · Cursor for Go