Cline vs Codeium
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Cline | Codeium | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | vscode-extension | extension |
| Vendor | open source | Codeium (same as Windsurf) |
| Pricing | Free tier (you pay LLM API costs directly) | Free tier · Enterprise $35/user |
| Autocomplete | No | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | No |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| Local models | Yes | No |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | No | Yes |
| Team features | No | Yes |
Where Cline wins
- works inside VS Code you already use
- MCP support
- local models
Where Codeium wins
- generous free tier
- wide IDE support (40+)
- self-hosted option for enterprises
Weaknesses
Cline: you pay API costs directly; no autocomplete
Codeium: Codeium/Windsurf overlap is confusing; chat less polished than Cursor
Best for
Pick Cline if you are VS Code users who want an agent without switching IDE.
Pick Codeium if you are cost-conscious teams, or polyglot IDE users, or enterprises wanting self-host.
FAQ
Is Cline more expensive than Codeium?
Free tier (you pay LLM API costs directly) vs Free tier · Enterprise $35/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Cline and Codeium use the same AI models?
Cline supports: any via API. Codeium supports: proprietary, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
Best Cline and Codeium pairings by language
- Python: Cline for Python · Codeium for Python
- TypeScript: Cline for TypeScript · Codeium for TypeScript
- Rust: Cline for Rust · Codeium for Rust
- Go: Cline for Go · Codeium for Go