Amazon Q Developer vs Codeium
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Amazon Q Developer | Codeium | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | extension |
| Vendor | AWS | Codeium (same as Windsurf) |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $19/month (Pro tier for higher limits + advanced features) | Free tier · Enterprise $35/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | No |
| MCP support | No | No |
| Local models | No | No |
| Self-hosted | No | Yes |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Amazon Q Developer wins
- deep AWS integration
- IaC generation (CDK, Terraform)
- enterprise-friendly
Where Codeium wins
- generous free tier
- wide IDE support (40+)
- self-hosted option for enterprises
Weaknesses
Amazon Q Developer: only shines on AWS workloads; less impressive outside AWS context
Codeium: Codeium/Windsurf overlap is confusing; chat less polished than Cursor
Best for
Pick Amazon Q Developer if you are AWS-heavy devs, or cloud infrastructure work, or enterprises on AWS.
Pick Codeium if you are cost-conscious teams, or polyglot IDE users, or enterprises wanting self-host.
Try Amazon Q Developer Try Codeium
FAQ
Is Amazon Q Developer more expensive than Codeium?
Free tier · Pro $19/month (Pro tier for higher limits + advanced features) vs Free tier · Enterprise $35/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Amazon Q Developer and Codeium use the same AI models?
Amazon Q Developer supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, internal-aws. Codeium supports: proprietary, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-4.1. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor
- Amazon Q Developer vs Windsurf
- Amazon Q Developer vs Claude Code
- Amazon Q Developer vs GitHub Copilot
- Amazon Q Developer vs Aider