Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor
Auto-updated comparison · last refreshed September 3, 2026
TL;DR
| Amazon Q Developer | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | extension | ide-fork |
| Vendor | AWS | Anysphere |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $19/month (Pro tier for higher limits + advanced features) | Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes |
| MCP support | No | Yes |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted | No | No |
| Codebase indexing | Yes | Yes |
| Team features | Yes | Yes |
Where Amazon Q Developer wins
- deep AWS integration
- IaC generation (CDK, Terraform)
- enterprise-friendly
Where Cursor wins
- autocomplete speed
- MCP support
- composer for multi-file
Weaknesses
Amazon Q Developer: only shines on AWS workloads; less impressive outside AWS context
Cursor: can lose context on branch switch; fast-request quota depletes quickly
Best for
Pick Amazon Q Developer if you are AWS-heavy devs, or cloud infrastructure work, or enterprises on AWS.
Pick Cursor if you are experienced devs, or macOS users, or MCP-heavy workflows.
Try Amazon Q Developer Try Cursor
FAQ
Is Amazon Q Developer more expensive than Cursor?
Free tier · Pro $19/month (Pro tier for higher limits + advanced features) vs Free tier · Pro $20/month · Business $40/user. Compare the Pro tiers first if you're a solo dev; Business/Enterprise only matters for teams.
Do Amazon Q Developer and Cursor use the same AI models?
Amazon Q Developer supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, internal-aws. Cursor supports: claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gpt-4.1, gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro. Most modern tools default to Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 2026.
Can I use both?
Yes. They don't conflict at the file level. Some devs use one for autocomplete and one for agent work.
Related comparisons
- Amazon Q Developer vs Windsurf
- Amazon Q Developer vs Claude Code
- Amazon Q Developer vs GitHub Copilot
- Amazon Q Developer vs Aider
- Amazon Q Developer vs Cline